极限集邮网

标题: 请问邮戳是巴西那个地点 [打印本页]

作者: OCEAN 时间: 2008-7-20 11:24
标题: 请问邮戳是巴西那个地点
请问邮戳是巴西那个地点,跟明信片地点有关么

作者: ngsunyu 时间: 2008-7-20 12:28
标题: 平台石（Pedra da Gavea）
<

>奇久卡國家公園（Parque Nacional da Tijuca）內有一處鮮少不被人注意到的自然景觀，它便是「平台石」，在海拔842公尺的地方豁然拔起，的確引人注目。(http://www.brazilonboard.com/rio/17381.asp)
<

edra da Gávea (literally Rock of the Topsail), is an impressive rock rising 842 meters above sea level at the highest point, located in Floresta da Tijuca in the city of Rio de Janeiro (里約熱內盧). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedra_da_G%C3%A1vea)

作者: ngsunyu 时间: 2008-7-25 08:58
<

正確郵戳價4430新臺幣，320新臺幣可能不正確郵戳。

作者: OCEAN 时间: 2008-7-27 16:50
 
对不起,戳的正确与否,不是和卖价成正比,若是依照这个理论,只要卖高价就是正确么?

作者: OCEAN 时间: 2008-7-27 16:52
感谢ngsunyu提供宝贵意见

作者: OCEAN 时间: 2008-7-27 16:58
<

>另一片

作者: ngsunyu 时间: 2008-7-28 03:05

以下是引用OCEAN在2008-7-27 16:50:15的发言：

<>
对不起,戳的正确与否,不是和卖价成正比,若是依照这个理论,只要卖高价就是正确么?

<>
<>

>I agree that my comments should not be taken as a general statement but it is correct in this particular case. These two cards, with two different Brazilian stamps from the 1930's, nonetheless depict similar topics (里約熱內盧的山). Therefore their value should not differ by over 13-fold. I am confident that the seller of the higher priced card, being an award winner at international competitions, would know the value of his cards. Although this card did not sell at eBay, it could be attributed more to the popularity of the topic (i.e. relative to other more popular topics, for example, sculpture) than to the asking price. I am sure that the seller of the lower priced item is knowledgeable too. Therefore you could have asked him about the postmark before you placed the bid. Any way it is a fair price for the old postcard without accounting for the US $ 1.50 value of the used stamp.
<

>
In general, philatelic prices depend on three factors: rareity (ie supply), demand and condition. Assuming superb conditions and similar demands (collector of one item would want the other item too) for both cards, then the crucial price determinant is rareity. The higher priced card carried a pricier stamp (US $ 9 vs US $ 3) but that is insignificant relative to the value of the maximum card(s). Thus the final value rests on the rareity of the correct Rio postmark. Do you not agree?

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-30 7:57:28编辑过]

作者: OCEAN 时间: 2008-7-30 23:36
<

>dear friend,
<

>thanks for your help and information. i see.
<

> i do not care for Rio de Janeiro , because my postmark of postcard is not.
<

>i care where is ldelgn of postmark in brazil.
<

>maybe ldelgn is near gavea rock, maybe ldelgn is far for gavea rock.
<

>by ocean

作者: ngsunyu 时间: 2008-7-31 04:24
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_das_maiores_cidades_do_Brasil

欢迎光临极限集邮网 (http://www.chinamaxicard.com/)